Posts

Why Your Company's Training Budget is Being Wasted (And How I Learnt This the Hard Way)

The email arrived at 2:47 PM on a Wednesday. "Mandatory diversity training for all staff this Friday afternoon." I stared at my screen, watching my carefully planned week crumble faster than a Tim Tam in hot coffee.

After seventeen years in corporate training and development, I can tell you with absolute certainty that 78% of company training budgets are essentially money thrown into a black hole. And before you roll your eyes and think this is another consultant trying to sell you something, hear me out. I've been on both sides of this disaster – as the trainer taking companies' money and as the employee sitting through mind-numbing sessions about "synergistic paradigm shifts."

The problem isn't that training is inherently useless. It's that most organisations approach it like they're ticking boxes for an audit rather than actually developing their people.

The Cookie-Cutter Catastrophe

Walk into any corporate training room in Melbourne, Sydney, or Brisbane, and you'll see the same thing. PowerPoint slides that look like they were designed in 2003. Role-playing exercises that make everyone cringe. And facilitators who clearly learnt their craft from a manual titled "How to Bore People Into Submission."

I remember running a communication skills workshop for a mining company in Perth back in 2019. The HR manager had specifically requested "something interactive and engaging." What they got was a one-size-fits-all program that treated a gruff underground supervisor the same way as a fresh graduate in accounts receivable.

That's the first massive problem. Generic training programs.

You wouldn't use the same wrench to fix a Mercedes and a Caterpillar excavator, would you? Yet companies routinely expect the same leadership training to work for a team leader managing three people and a general manager overseeing 200 staff across multiple sites.

The "Set and Forget" Mentality

Here's where it gets really frustrating. Companies will spend $15,000 on a two-day workshop, pat themselves on the back for "investing in people," and then wonder why nothing changes six months later.

Training without follow-up is like going to the gym once and expecting to lose 10 kilos.

I've seen this pattern repeatedly: Big announcement about new training initiative. Expensive external trainer brought in. Staff attend (often reluctantly). Everyone feels good about ticking the professional development box. Three months later, people are doing exactly what they did before.

The most successful program I ever ran was for a small accounting firm in Adelaide. Instead of a traditional workshop, we did monthly 90-minute sessions over six months. By session three, participants were bringing real workplace scenarios to discuss. By session six, they were coaching each other. The managing partner told me it was the best investment they'd made in years.

But here's the thing – it cost them more per hour than their flashy competitors who promise the world in a single day.

The Feedback Fallacy

Most training evaluation forms are absolutely useless. "Rate the presenter from 1-5." "Would you recommend this course to a colleague?" "What did you enjoy most about today?"

These questions tell you nothing about whether people will actually change their behaviour.

I learnt this lesson the hard way during my early days as a trainer. I was getting fantastic feedback scores – 4.8 out of 5 consistently. Participants loved the energy, the activities, the catered lunch. But when I started following up with managers three months later, they couldn't identify any meaningful changes in their teams.

That's when I realised I was essentially running expensive entertainment sessions disguised as professional development.

The companies that see real results from training ask different questions. They want to know what specific behaviours participants will change. They ask for measurable outcomes. They schedule follow-up sessions to track progress.

BHP, for instance, has one of the most robust training evaluation systems I've encountered. They measure everything from supervisor feedback to productivity metrics before and after training interventions. It's no wonder their safety training programs are considered world-class.

The Technology Trap

Don't get me started on e-learning platforms.

Actually, do get me started. Because this is where companies are hemorrhaging money faster than a punctured water tank.

E-learning can be brilliant when done properly. But most organisations buy these massive learning management systems, upload a bunch of generic content, and expect miracles. They track completion rates rather than comprehension. They measure time spent rather than skills gained.

I worked with a retail chain that proudly told me their customer service e-learning had a 98% completion rate. When I dug deeper, I discovered most staff were clicking through modules as fast as possible just to get their "certificate of completion." The average time spent on a 45-minute module was 12 minutes.

That's not training. That's box-ticking with a digital bow on top.

What Actually Works (From Someone Who's Seen It All)

Real training transformation happens when organisations stop treating professional development like a necessary evil and start approaching it strategically.

The best programs I've been involved with share three characteristics:

They start with clear business outcomes. Not "we want better communication" but "we want to reduce customer complaints by 30% in six months." Not "leadership development" but "we want our team leaders to have quarterly performance conversations that actually improve productivity."

They're designed for specific roles and challenges. A time management training session for project managers looks completely different from one designed for sales representatives. Different pressures, different priorities, different solutions.

They include ongoing reinforcement. This might be peer coaching, manager check-ins, micro-learning modules, or follow-up workshops. But it's never a one-and-done approach.

I've noticed something interesting about the companies that get training right – they often spend less per employee than their competitors. They're just more strategic about where and how they invest.

The Australian Context (Because We Do Things Differently)

Australian workplace culture adds another layer of complexity to training design. We're generally more skeptical of corporate speak. We value practical, no-nonsense approaches. We're not impressed by fancy certificates or international guru status.

The most effective trainers I know in this market are those who can blend professionalism with approachability. They can discuss serious business concepts without sounding like they swallowed a management textbook.

Cultural fit matters enormously. I've seen brilliant overseas trainers completely bomb in Australian workplaces because they couldn't adapt their style. And I've seen local trainers with modest credentials achieve remarkable results because they understood their audience.

This is particularly important in regional areas. A training approach that works in Collins Street might fall flat in Gladstone or Wagga Wagga. Local context, industry knowledge, and cultural awareness aren't nice-to-haves – they're essential.

The Uncomfortable Truth About ROI

Here's something most training providers won't tell you: measuring return on investment from professional development is incredibly difficult. We can track immediate reactions, learning outcomes, and sometimes behaviour change. But linking training directly to business results? That's complicated.

This doesn't mean training is worthless. It means we need to be more honest about what we can and can't measure.

I've stopped promising specific ROI figures to clients. Instead, I focus on indicators that suggest training is having an impact: increased engagement scores, improved customer feedback, reduced turnover in key roles, faster time-to-competency for new hires.

The organisations that see the best results from training aren't necessarily those that demand precise ROI calculations. They're the ones that view professional development as a long-term investment in their people and culture.

Moving Forward (Without the Corporate Waffle)

If you're responsible for training in your organisation, here's my blunt advice:

Stop buying training solutions before you've identified specific problems. Start with what's not working in your business, then find training that addresses those issues.

Question every external provider who promises miraculous results from a single intervention. Real behaviour change takes time and reinforcement.

Invest in developing internal capability rather than relying entirely on external trainers. Your supervisors and managers should be equipped to reinforce and extend formal training.

And for the love of all that's holy, stop measuring success by how many people attended or how happy they were with the catering.

The companies winning in today's market aren't those with the biggest training budgets. They're the ones using those budgets most strategically. They're treating professional development as a competitive advantage rather than a compliance requirement.

Your people are your most expensive asset. Isn't it time you started developing them accordingly?

Other Blogs: Communication Skills Training • Professional Development ROI • Workplace Training Effectiveness